Citations (1)


Footnotes (408)



Technocracy and Democracy: Conflicts between Models and Participation in Environmental Law and Planning

James D Fine

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Dave Owen

University of Maine - School of Law

Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 56, No. 5, 2005

Many of our environmental laws create an unfortunate paradox. They mandate science-based planning, and that mandate often translates into a practical or legal requirement to use complex simulation models. These laws also contain provisions for public participation. When agencies engage in technical decision-making, however, and particularly when they use complex simulation models, the reasoning and risks underpinning decisions become difficult for public participants to understand and critique. As a result, legal mandates for science-based and participatory planning come into conflict. This conflict is inherent in many environmental statutes, and is acute in the State Implementation Plan (SIP) process required by the Clean Air Act. In this article, we explore the tension between public participation and modeling by focusing on the SIP development process and the limitations and resultant risks associated with decisions based on modeling. Drawing upon literature from the fields of air quality science and modeling, risk assessment and management, planning, law, and science and technology studies, and also upon interviews, we discuss the roots of the problem, exploring the origins of legal requirements for both public participation and modeling. We highlight the ways in which planning depends upon models and in which model use impedes public participation. We provide a retrospective case study of a particular SIP planning process—the 1994 development of the San Joaquin Valley ozone plan for California's SIP—to illustrate tensions between model-based planning and public participation. While we conclude that these tensions are somewhat unavoidable, we close with recommendations for ameliorating them without excluding public concerns or compromising the sophistication and integrity of science-led planning.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 82

Keywords: Models, public participation, Clean Air Act, state implementation plan, risk, uncertainty, San Joaquin Valley

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 28, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Fine, James D and Owen, Dave, Technocracy and Democracy: Conflicts between Models and Participation in Environmental Law and Planning. Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 56, No. 5, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1009271

Contact Information

James D Fine
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory ( email )
One Cyclotron Road
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States
Dave Owen (Contact Author)
University of Maine - School of Law ( email )
246 Deering Avenue
Portland, ME 04102
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,083
Downloads: 196
Download Rank: 99,907
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  408

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds