SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (273)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Presidential Power and the 'Ongoing Criminal Investigation' Constraint: Getting Away With Silence

Luke M. Milligan
University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law



William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2008
University of Louisville School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2008-14

Abstract:     
The presidencies of William J. Clinton and George W. Bush are in many ways kindred. It seems certain that both will be noted by historians for their determined and mechanistic evasions of public scrutiny. The misleading insinuations, failed memories, perjuries, obstructions of justice, and novel assertions of executive privilege have been exposed sharply and criticized roundly by Congress, academics, and the press.

Still, there is a particular tactic of presidential evasion, utilized by Clinton and Bush alike, that has been left undisturbed. This is the White House's increasingly regular practice of claiming that the President and his advisors are "constrained" from publicly commenting on particular matters due to the existence of an "ongoing criminal investigation." In many minds, the invocation of this constraint, no matter the circumstances, reflexively transforms a White House stonewall into an instance of responsible and principled presidential restraint.

This Article examines the "ongoing criminal investigation" constraint, and argues that its scope is limited and discernible. The constraint does not, for instance, extend to investigations (1) over which the President lacks control; and (2) which suggest that he or his associates committed improprieties. The practical impact of this conclusion is that Presidents are never externally constrained from publicly commenting on matters pursued by Special Counsels, which, by their very nature, are independent of the White House's control, and concern allegations of high-level executive branch malfeasance.

Keywords: Criminal Procedure, Prosecutorial Discretion, Faithful Execution Clause

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: September 05, 2007 ; Last revised: November 20, 2008

Suggested Citation

Milligan, Luke M., Presidential Power and the 'Ongoing Criminal Investigation' Constraint: Getting Away With Silence. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2008; University of Louisville School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2008-14. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1009749


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Luke M. Milligan (Contact Author)
University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law ( email )
Wilson W. Wyatt Hall
Louisville, KY 40292
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 424
Downloads: 103
Download Rank: 77,288
Footnotes: 273

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.266 seconds.