Abstract

 


 



An Analysis of the UDRP Experience: Is it Time for Reform?


Pablo Cortes


University of Leicester

27 August 2007

Computer Law and Security Report, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2008

Abstract:     
ICANN with the UDRP has achieved in developing a transparent global online dispute resolution procedure based on contractual adherence that allows trade mark owners to fight efficiently cybersquatting. This paper may be divided in two main parts. First, the interpretation of the UDRP policy is discussed at the light of UDRP panel decisions. Secondly, this paper evaluates the UDRP rules, which have been harshly criticized for the use of proceedings that are seen in favour of complainants. From the creation of the UDRP up until now the UDRP has not shown any intentions of reform despite all the existing criticisms. After nearly one decade of experience it appears clear that the UDRP needs to be reviewed if it aims to provide, not only an efficient but a fair procedure. This article concludes by considering the main steps towards reforming ICANN's UDRP.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: arbitration, ODR, ADR, UDRP, ICANN, online dispute resolution

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 22, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Cortes, Pablo, An Analysis of the UDRP Experience: Is it Time for Reform? (27 August 2007). Computer Law and Security Report, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1010088

Contact Information

Pablo Cortes (Contact Author)
University of Leicester ( email )
Leicester LE1 7RH
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,112
Downloads: 281
Download Rank: 51,903
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.656 seconds