Norms, Conformity, and Controls
William B. Tayler
Brigham Young University
Robert J. Bloomfield
Cornell University - Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management
November 1, 2010
AAA 2011 Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting Paper
Research in behavioral economics suggests that in addition to their traditional incentive effects, formal control systems can influence psychological motivations. We extend this literature by demonstrating experimentally that formal controls directly influence people’s sense of what behaviors are appropriate in the setting (personal norms), and indirectly alter people’s tendency to conform to the behavior of those around them (descriptive norms). These effects persist even after the controls are changed, so that the effects of current controls can be strongly influenced by past control strength. Our results support those who are incorporating psychological factors into principal-agent models (such as Fischer and Huddart ), and suggest that those models should be further modified to incorporate correlations between personal norms and conformity to descriptive norms.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 54
Keywords: controls, conformity, social norms, crowding out, public goods
JEL Classification: C70, C72, H26, H41, M40working papers series
Date posted: September 11, 2007 ; Last revised: December 3, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.828 seconds