On Beyond CalPERS: Survey Evidence on the Developing Role of Public Pension Funds in Corporate Governance
Stephen J. Choi
New York University School of Law
Jill E. Fisch
Institute for Law and Economics, University of Pennsylvania Law School
Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 61, p. 315, 2008
NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 07-30
Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1010330
We survey public pension funds and report on their litigation and non-litigation activism. We report that activity levels vary, dramatically. Although some funds engage in a substantial amount of governance activity, a significant number do little or nothing. Public pension funds engage in a very limited spectrum of non-litigation activities, involving primarily low visibility activities such as participation in corporate governance organizations or withholding votes from a management nominee. Funds with more assets under management are far more active in non-litigation activism. Similarly, funds that devote more resources generally to in-house activities are also more active in non-litigation activism. A marked difference exists for litigation activism. Public pension fund participate much more extensively in shareholder litigation than in other governance activities. Despite the importance of asset size for participation levels, we also find that for litigation-related activism, smaller funds participate with equal frequency.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 40
Keywords: institutional investors, pension funds, shareholder activism, corporate governance
JEL Classification: K22
Date posted: September 3, 2007 ; Last revised: November 23, 2009
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds