SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (55)

Beta

 
 

Citations (3)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Rich State, Poor State, Red State, Blue State: What's the Matter with Connecticut?

Andrew Gelman
Columbia University - Department of Statistics and Department of Political Science

Boris Shor
University of Chicago - Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies

Joseph Bafumi
Dartmouth College - Department of Government

David Park
George Washington University


November 2005


Abstract:     
We find that income matters more in "red America" than in "blue America." In poor states, rich people are much more likely than poor people to vote for the Republican presidential candidate, but in rich states (such as Connecticut), income has a very low correlation with vote preference. In addition to finding this pattern and studying its changes over time, we
use the concepts of typicality and availability from cognitive psychology to explain how these patterns can be commonly misunderstood. Our results can be viewed either as a debunking of the journalistic image of rich "latte" Democrats and poor "Nascar " Republicans, or as support for the journalistic images of political and cultural differences between red and blue states—differences which are not explained by differences in individuals' incomes.

For decades, the Democrats have been viewed as the party of the poor, with the Republicans representing the rich. Recent presidential elections, however, have shown a reverse pattern, with Democrats performing well in the richer "blue" states in the northeast and west coast, and Republicans dominating in the "red" states in the middle of the country. Through multilevel modeling of individual-level survey data and county- and state-level demographic and electoral data, we reconcile these patterns.

Key methods used in this research are: (1) plots of repeated cross-sectional analyses, (2) varying-intercept, varying-slope multilevel models, and (3) a graph that simultaneously shows within-group and between-group patterns in a multilevel model. These statistical tools help us understand patterns of variation within and between states in a way that would not be possible from classical regressions or by looking at tables of coefficient estimates.

Keywords: availability heuristic, ecological fallacy, hierarchical model, income and voting, multilevel model, presidential elections, public opinion, secret weapon, varying-slope model

Working Paper Series

Date posted: September 11, 2007 ; Last revised: September 11, 2007

Suggested Citation

Gelman, Andrew, Shor, Boris, Bafumi, Joseph and Park, David, Rich State, Poor State, Red State, Blue State: What's the Matter with Connecticut? (November 2005). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1010426


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Andrew Gelman (Contact Author)
Columbia University - Department of Statistics and Department of Political Science ( email )
New York, NY 10027
United States
212-854-4883 (Phone)
212-663-2454 (Fax)
Joseph Bafumi
Dartmouth College - Department of Government ( email )
United States
David Park
George Washington University ( email )
2121 I Street NW
Washington, DC 20052
United States
Boris Shor
University of Chicago - Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies ( email )
1155 East 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 984
Downloads: 221
Download Rank: 38,388
References: 55
Citations: 3

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.109 seconds.