Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1010464
 
 

Footnotes (2)



 


 



'Impeaching' Cooperating Witnesses


Stephen A. Saltzburg


George Washington University School of Law


Criminal Justice, Vol. 22, No. 2, Summer 2007
GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 344
GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 344

Abstract:     
This article, discussing trial tactics, considers the scenario in which the government seeks to elicit testimony from a witness, involved in the criminal activity, that has entered into a plea agreement; the defendant offers to stipulate that the defense will make no effort to impeach the witness through the use of the plea agreement and moves to exclude it from evidence; yet the prosecutor insists upon using the agreement. The article discusses United States v. Richardson, 421 F.3d 17 (1st Cir. 2005), and United States v. McNeill, 728 F.2d 5 (1st Cir. 1984), and concludes that there is no sensible distinction to be drawn between them.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 4

Keywords: impeachment, witness credibility, evidence, plea agreement, Richardson, McNeill

JEL Classification: K14, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 3, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Saltzburg, Stephen A., 'Impeaching' Cooperating Witnesses. Criminal Justice, Vol. 22, No. 2, Summer 2007; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 344; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 344. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1010464

Contact Information

Stephen A. Saltzburg (Contact Author)
George Washington University School of Law ( email )
2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-994-7089 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 549
Downloads: 88
Download Rank: 171,730
Footnotes:  2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.234 seconds