Abstract

 
 

References (27)



 


 



Network Expansion Decision-Making in the Twin Cities


Norah Montes de Oca


affiliation not provided to SSRN

David Matthew Levinson


University of Minnesota - Twin Cities


Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1981, pp. 1-11, 2006

Abstract:     
This paper presents a qualitative analysis of the decision-rules used by jurisdictions in Minnesota's Twin Cities metropolitan area. Interviews were conducted with staff at the city, county, metropolitan, and state levels to determine how decisions about road investment, expansion and new construction were made. Flowcharts were developed to provide a more systematic way of presenting that information. Most jurisdictions do not have extensive public participation processes, though several, notably the Metropolitan Council, Hennepin and Ramsey Counties and the City of Minneapolis do. Jurisdictions with public participation have the most formal and extensive documentation of their investment decision process. The decision factors vary by jurisdiction, though safety, capacity, and pavement quality were important throughout.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: decision-rules, network expansion, Twin Cities, safety, capacity, pavement quality

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 11, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Montes de Oca, Norah and Levinson, David Matthew, Network Expansion Decision-Making in the Twin Cities. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1010512

Contact Information

Norah Montes de Oca
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
David Matthew Levinson (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities ( email )
420 Delaware St. SE
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 239
Downloads: 21
References:  27

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.484 seconds