SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (102)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Dredging Up the Past: Lifelogging, Memory and Surveillance

Anita L. Allen
University of Pennsylvania Law School



University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 47, 2008
U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 07-33

Abstract:     
The term "lifelog" refers to a comprehensive archive of an individual's quotidian existence, created with the help of pervasive computing technologies. Lifelog technologies would record and store everyday conversations, actions, and experiences of their users, enabling future replay and aiding remembrance. Products to assist lifelogging are already on the market; but the technology that will enable people fully and continuously to document their entire lives is still in the research and development phase. For generals, edgy artists and sentimental grandmothers alike, lifelogging could someday replace or complement, existing memory preservation practices. Like a traditional diary, journal or day-book, the lifelog could preserve subjectively noteworthy facts and impressions. Like an old-fashioned photo album, scrapbook or home video, it could retain images of childhood, loved-ones and travels. Like a cardboard box time capsule or filing cabinet it could store correspondence and documents. Like personal computing software, it could record communications data, keystrokes and internet trails. The lifelog could easily store data pertaining to purely biological states derived from continuous self-monitoring of, for example, heart rate, respiration, blood sugar, blood pressure and arousal. To the extent that it preserves personal experience for voluntary private consumption, electronic lifelogging looks innocent enough, as innocent as Blackberries, home movies, and snapshots in silver picture frames. But lifelogging could fuel excessive self-absorption, since users would be engaged in making multimedia presentations about themselves all the time. The availability of lifelogging technology might lead individuals to overvalue the otherwise transient details of their lives. Furthermore, the potential would be great for incivility, emotional blackmail, exploitation, prosecution and social control by government surrounding lifelog creation, content and accessibility. Existing privacy law and policy do not suggest meaningful limits on unwanted uses of lifelogging data. This parry of the costs and benefits commences a fuller discussion of lifelogging's ethical and legal implications.

Keywords: privacy, surveillance, lifelog, life log, sousveillance, memory

JEL Classifications: B31, C88, D80

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: September 03, 2007 ; Last revised: April 06, 2009

Suggested Citation

Allen, Anita L., Dredging Up the Past: Lifelogging, Memory and Surveillance. University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 47, 2008; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 07-33. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1010936


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Anita L. Allen (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3400 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6204
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 963
Downloads: 172
Download Rank: 49,573
Footnotes: 102
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.282 seconds.