Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1012220
 
 

Footnotes (114)



 


 



Thinking Like a Lawyer: The Heuristics of Case Synthesis


Jane Kent Gionfriddo


Boston College - Law School


Texas Tech Law Review, Vol. 40, 2007
Boston College Law School Research Paper No. 138

Abstract:     
In a common law system where cases play such an important role in legal problem-solving, lawyers must be able to synthesize ideas from groups of cases to figure out a jurisdiction's law at a particular point in time; in reality, however, many lawyers aren't able to do so well enough for sophisticated law practice. Some lawyers understand and use this skill intuitively, but do not consciously think about the steps they actually take. Those in this group often do not sufficiently value case synthesis because it seems so obvious, with the result that they don't necessarily use this skill to its full potential. Others don't intuitively understand how to synthesize cases and have never learned a methodology to do so. Lawyers in this situation simply are not able to manipulate case law adequately and consequently fail to produce the necessary depth of analysis to represent clients effectively.

This article's goal is to ensure that lawyers in practice - and teachers in law schools who train future lawyers - have a sufficient understanding of synthesizing cases. To achieve this, the article begins by describing the theory behind this skill as well as a methodology that will generate the subtle nuances of analysis necessary for sophisticated law practice. The article then proceeds to apply this methodology to a group of hypothetical cases that have been designed to demonstrate the complex permutations of actually working with a group of cases to solve a client's problem.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: legal analysis, analytical skills, legal problem-solving, doctrine of stare decisis, case synthesis, synthesize ideas, explicit reasoning, implicit reasoning, inferred ideas, hypothesize and test back, objective analysis of law, sophisticated law practice

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 7, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Gionfriddo, Jane Kent, Thinking Like a Lawyer: The Heuristics of Case Synthesis. Texas Tech Law Review, Vol. 40, 2007; Boston College Law School Research Paper No. 138. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1012220

Contact Information

Jane Kent Gionfriddo (Contact Author)
Boston College - Law School ( email )
885 Centre Street
Newton, MA 02459-1163
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,661
Downloads: 1,510
Download Rank: 5,619
Footnotes:  114
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Logic for Law Students: How to Think Like a Lawyer
By Ruggero Aldisert, Stephen Clowney, ...

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.250 seconds