The Rule of Intellectual Property Law in the Internet Economy
Fordham University School of Law
Houston Law Review, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 1074-1095, 2007
Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1012504
The adaptation to the Internet economy of intellectual property law in general, and copyright law in particular, is at the center of a profound power struggle for governance that places democratically chosen legal rules against technologist-defined network rules. This essay argues that many of the technological challenges to intellectual property rights such as peer-to-peer software are a movement against democratically chosen intellectual property rules. These challenges reflect a basic defiance of the Rule of Law. In making this argument, the essay first maintains that intellectual property rights have an important public function in democracy marking political, economic and social boundaries. Next, the essay shows that the public law, as enacted by democratic government, has re-allocated intellectual property rights to adapt to the information economy. While many aspects of the new allocation of rights have been controversial such as the scope of copyright's anti-circumvention provisions, these decisions nevertheless emanate from duly constituted public authorities. The essay then analyzes the rejection of those rules by technologists and their fight to take control of rule-making. In essence, the technical community seeks to replace the state's decision on public intellectual property law with the community's own private preferences in subversion of democratic choices. The essay concludes with the normative prediction that public law prevails over network rule-making.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23
Keywords: intellectual property, copyright, open source, free software, internet, rule of law, digital economy, digital rights management, anti-circumvention, p2p, file sharing
JEL Classification: O34, O38, K10, K20, K30, K39, K40, K42, L86, N40Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 11, 2007 ; Last revised: January 21, 2008
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.594 seconds