Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1012949
 
 

Citations (8)



 
 

Footnotes (247)



 


 



Practice Makes Perfect? An Empirical Study of Claim Construction Reversal Rates in Patent Cases


David L. Schwartz


Illinois Institute of Technology - Chicago-Kent College of Law

2008

Michigan Law Review, Vol. 107, p. 223, 2008
3rd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Papers
Chicago-Kent Intellectual Property, Science & Technology Research Paper No. 09-016

Abstract:     
This article examines the question of whether United States district court judges improve their skills at patent claim construction as a function of experience, including as a function of having their own cases reviewed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In theory, higher courts teach doctrine to lower courts via judicial decisions, and lower courts learn from these decisions. This article tests the teaching-and-learning premise on the issue of claim construction in the realities of patent litigation. While others have shown that the Federal Circuit reverses a large percentage of lower court claim constructions, no one has analyzed whether judges with more claim construction appeal experience fare better on subsequent appeals.

Surprisingly, the data do not reveal any evidence that district court judges learn from prior appeals of their rulings. There is no suggestion of a significant relationship between experience and performance. The lack of evidence that Federal Circuit review aids district court judges is disconcerting. The article explores three possible explanations for the lack of evidence: (1) the indeterminate nature of claim construction; (2) that district court judges are incapable of or not interested in learning how to perform claim construction; and (3) that the Federal Circuit decisions do a poor job of teaching district court judges how to construe claims. These results shed critical light on the functioning of the patent system. Moreover, the results are relevant to a broader understanding of the relationship between higher and lower courts in general.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 64

Keywords: patent, claim construction, empirical, judge, reversal, judicial

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 16, 2008 ; Last revised: September 28, 2010

Suggested Citation

Schwartz, David L., Practice Makes Perfect? An Empirical Study of Claim Construction Reversal Rates in Patent Cases (2008). Michigan Law Review, Vol. 107, p. 223, 2008; 3rd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Papers; Chicago-Kent Intellectual Property, Science & Technology Research Paper No. 09-016. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1012949

Contact Information

David L. Schwartz (Contact Author)
Illinois Institute of Technology - Chicago-Kent College of Law ( email )
565 W. Adams St.
Chicago, IL 60661-3691
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 6,350
Downloads: 1,041
Download Rank: 10,710
Citations:  8
Footnotes:  247

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.359 seconds