|
||||
|
||||
Consumption Taxation is Still Superior to Income TaxationDavid A. WeisbachUniversity of Chicago - Law School; Center for Robust Decisionmaking on Climate & Energy Policy (RDCEP) Joseph BankmanStanford Law School September 2007 U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 358 Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 350 Abstract: This essay responds to an article by Daniel Shaviro which argues in part that the failure of empirical assumptions behind the permanent income hypothesis undermines the case for preferring consumption taxation over income taxation. We consider each of Shaviro's arguments and conclude that none change the basic considerations in favor of consumption taxation in any significant way. Shaviro concludes that administrability and implementation concerns should be central to the choice of the tax base and that these concerns are likely to point to taxing consumption. We agree with this conclusion.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20 working papers seriesDate posted: September 11, 2007 ; Last revised: September 29, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.438 seconds