|
||||
|
||||
Consumption Taxation is Still Superior to Income Taxation
David A. Weisbach University of Chicago - Law School Joseph Bankman Stanford Law School September 2007 U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 358 Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 350 Abstract: This essay responds to an article by Daniel Shaviro which argues in part that the failure of empirical assumptions behind the permanent income hypothesis undermines the case for preferring consumption taxation over income taxation. We consider each of Shaviro's arguments and conclude that none change the basic considerations in favor of consumption taxation in any significant way. Shaviro concludes that administrability and implementation concerns should be central to the choice of the tax base and that these concerns are likely to point to taxing consumption. We agree with this conclusion. Working Paper Series Date posted: September 11, 2007 ; Last revised: September 29, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.313 seconds.