|
||||
|
||||
The Endless Judicial Selection Debate and its Implications for the Future of an Independent JudiciaryCharles G. GeyhIndiana University School of Law-Bloomington Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 85 Abstract: In this overview, I begin by describing the five different systems of state judicial selection that have evolved out of a perennial struggle to strike an optimal balance between judicial independence and judicial accountability. I then explore recent developments that have intensified that struggle, before analyzing, with reference to available research, how different selection systems counter or accommodate such developments. My purpose here is not to write (another) position piece. Rather, my purpose is to step back and contextualize disputes over judicial selection with reference to the independence and accountability issues that animate them, and to isolate what we know and don't know about the assumptions that underlie the arguments of the disputants, so as to better frame future study and debate.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33 Keywords: Judicial elections, Judicial appointment, Judicial independence, Judicial accountability, Judicial conduct, Judicial ethics, Merit selection, Judicial selection Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: September 11, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.657 seconds