Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1014416
 
 

References (15)



 


 



A Note on Hedonic Valuation of Urban Amenities Using Unbalanced Data


Valerie Mueller


International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

Glenn David Sheriff


National Center for Environmental Economics, US EPA

September 15, 2008


Abstract:     
Hedonic valuation of urban amenities often requires estimating housing and labor market regressions. It is difficult to get both types of data for all survey respondents. We show that common practice of handling the unbalanced data by conducting two separate regressions can lead to inconsistent covariance matrix estimation and improper inference regarding confidence intervals for amenity values. We then demonstrate how two easily-implementable yet consistent techniques can be used for hedonic valuation with an application in valuing temperature increases in urban Brazil. All techniques estimate a net positive marginal value of a temperature increase. Unlike the separate equation estimation, however, techniques using a consistent covariance estimator are unable to reject at the 5 percent level the null hypothesis of a zero welfare effect.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: hedonic valuation, unbalanced data, seemingly unrelated regression

JEL Classification: C31, Q51

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 17, 2007 ; Last revised: January 4, 2012

Suggested Citation

Mueller, Valerie and Sheriff, Glenn David, A Note on Hedonic Valuation of Urban Amenities Using Unbalanced Data (September 15, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1014416 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1014416

Contact Information

Valerie Mueller (Contact Author)
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) ( email )
2033 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
United States

Glenn David Sheriff
National Center for Environmental Economics, US EPA ( email )
Washington, DC 20460
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 884
Downloads: 110
Download Rank: 147,567
References:  15

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.390 seconds