Let the Sun Shine on the Supreme Court
Thomas Jefferson School of Law
Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Vol. 35, p. 161, 2008
TJSL Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1015151
The Supreme Court has steadfastly refused to allow its oral arguments to be televised. Justices jealously guard their anonymity, which would be lost if they allowed television broadcasts. Yet arguments against cameras in the courtroom - intimidation of witnesses and jurors, and prejudice to the accused - are inapplicable to the high court. Beginning with the arguments in Bush v. Gore, the Court began to release audiotapes and transcripts of its proceedings. But in spite of Congressional attempts to open the Supreme Court to cameras, the justices remain opposed to cameras in their courtroom. This essay argues for camera coverage of Supreme Court arguments.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12
Keywords: televised trials, cameras in courtroom, Bush v. Gore, public trial, televising Supreme Court, access to trials, Supreme Court access, gavel-to-gavel coverage, oral arguments, broadcast coverage, television cameras, media exposure
JEL Classification: K40Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 20, 2007 ; Last revised: May 20, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.640 seconds