Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1015337
 
 

Footnotes (300)



 


 



Judicial Review and Sexual Freedom


Ruthann Robson


CUNY School of Law

2007

University of Hawaii Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2007

Abstract:     
Sexual freedoms have become a flashpoint for contemporary controversies surrounding judicial review. The power of an often unelected judiciary to declare acts of a usually elected legislature, or even products of direct democracy, void as unconstitutional, is a prominent feature of constitutionalism in the United States and in some, but not all, other constitutional democracies. Yet judicial review continues to be contested in jurisprudence, political discourse, and in judicial decisions themselves.

This article elucidates the mainstream theorizing on judicial review, arguing that it is deficient for three reasons. First, although the debates regarding judicial review refer to sexual freedoms, the theorizing is abstracted from the actual controversies surrounding sexual freedom and often implies that sexual freedom itself is of less consequence than the larger issues at stake. Second, the mainstream jurisprudential debates have mostly failed to incorporate the perspectives of feminist and queer legal theorists, even when such work has been directly relevant. Third, the debates in the United States regarding judicial review often proceed as if the United States is exceptional and sui generis, usually with a reflexive privileging of originalism and historical exegesis.

This article addresses these deficiencies by centralizing the substance of the controversies related to judicial review, by incorporating queer and feminist theorizing, and by considering in depth the disparate approaches to judicial review in three jurisdictions often considered at the forefront of sexual freedom: California, the Netherlands, and South Africa. The conclusion posits principles for theorizing judicial review in constitutional democracies in order to promote sexual freedom.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Keywords: sexuality, lesbian, democracy, constitutional law, judicial review, comparative law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 19, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Robson, Ruthann, Judicial Review and Sexual Freedom (2007). University of Hawaii Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1015337

Contact Information

Ruthann Robson (Contact Author)
CUNY School of Law ( email )
2 Court Square
Long Island City, NY 11101
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 756
Downloads: 62
Download Rank: 209,075
Footnotes:  300

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.328 seconds