Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1015585
 
 

Footnotes (195)



 


 



Severability as Judicial Lawmaking


David H. Gans


Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law


George Washington Law Review, Forthcoming
Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 204

Abstract:     
Severability doctrine raises fundamental questions about the judicial role in constitutional adjudication and the institutional relationship between courts and legislatures. It permits a court to excise a statute's unconstitutional clauses and applications and leave the remainder in force, effectively rewriting the statute to save it. Yet, the doctrine has long been viewed as a matter of statutory interpretation to be resolved by examining legislative intent, making it easy to obscure critical questions about the powers the doctrine grants to the judiciary.

This Article challenges the conventional wisdom about severability. First, it claims that the doctrine is part of the law of constitutional remedies, not a matter of statutory interpretation. Second, the article argues that, as a remedial doctrine, severability should not turn on legislative intent. The legislative intent test cannot sufficiently constrain a court's choice whether to sever the invalid parts of a statute, gives courts an extensive power to rewrite legislation, and distorts legislatures' incentives to comply with constitutional norms ex ante. The article concludes that the legislative intent test should be scrapped, and that courts should turn to separation of powers principles to constrain severability doctrine.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 49

Keywords: severability, statutory interpretation, court Congress dialogue

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 20, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Gans, David H., Severability as Judicial Lawmaking. George Washington Law Review, Forthcoming; Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 204. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1015585

Contact Information

David H. Gans (Contact Author)
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,136
Downloads: 154
Download Rank: 111,621
Footnotes:  195

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 1.422 seconds