Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1015618
 
 

Footnotes (178)



 


 



The Story of Ex Parte Milligan: Military Trials, Enemy Combatants, and Congressional Authorization


Curtis A. Bradley


Duke University - School of Law

December 1, 2007


Abstract:     
In Ex parte Milligan, decided a year after the end of the Civil War, the Supreme Court held that the U.S. military had lacked the constitutional authority during the war to try U.S. citizens living in Indiana before a military commission. Milligan is often cited as a rare and admirable instance in which the Supreme Court invalidated Executive action during wartime in order to protect civil liberties, and it is frequently invoked in challenges to government action in the current war on terrorism. The precedential effect of Milligan, however, is far from clear. Part of the uncertainty stems from the decision's apparent inconsistency with widespread military practices during and immediately after the Civil War, including most notably the use of military commissions to try thousands of individuals not formally associated with the Confederate army. Probably because of the particular way in which the government argued the Milligan case - focusing on the bounds of martial law rather than on military jurisdiction over violations of the laws of war - the Court in Milligan did not discuss this widespread military commission practice, and it is unclear to what extent the Court meant to repudiate it. The Supreme Court's subsequent treatments of Milligan only add to the uncertainty about its scope. The Court has construed Milligan as applying only to the military detention and trial of non-belligerents, but neither Milligan nor the subsequent decisions provide a clear line for distinguishing between belligerents and non-belligerents. One possible approach would be to limit military jurisdiction to individuals covered by the international laws of war, but one problem with this approach is that the petitioners in Milligan were in fact charged with and convicted of violating the laws of war. The difficult issues of military jurisdiction that were present during the Civil War turn out to be with us still today.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: military commissions, habeas corpus, war on terrorism

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 24, 2007 ; Last revised: August 10, 2009

Suggested Citation

Bradley, Curtis A., The Story of Ex Parte Milligan: Military Trials, Enemy Combatants, and Congressional Authorization (December 1, 2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1015618 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1015618

Contact Information

Curtis A. Bradley (Contact Author)
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,484
Downloads: 361
Download Rank: 47,541
Footnotes:  178

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.265 seconds