SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (39)

Beta

 


 



Environmental Rights in the EC Legal Order

Pavlos Eleftheriadis
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law


September 2007

Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 24/2007

Abstract:     
This article attempts to offer a general framework for the protection of environmental rights in the European Union's legal order. The article discusses the Aarhus Convention, which follows the international trend for procedural protection of environmental rights. The European Commission proposes to give effect to its 'access to justice' dimension of the Aarhus Convention in a way that endorses uniformtity as a goal. I argue that this goal is mistaken. The guiding constitutional principle in this area should be that unless there are strong reasons to the contrary, EC law will only supplement the public law of the Member States by providing minimum standards. Under the scheme of environmental rights established by the Aarhus Convention each applicant or environmental activist may have slightly different rights depending on the country where he or she starts their actions or launches their campaigns. The public law of the EC, of which environmental law is now a major part, is not an attempt at harmonization nor is it a simple deduction from the principles of direct effect and supremacy.

Working Paper Series

Date posted: September 22, 2007 ; Last revised: September 22, 2007

Suggested Citation

Eleftheriadis, Pavlos , Environmental Rights in the EC Legal Order (September 2007). Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 24/2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1015923


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Pavlos Eleftheriadis (Contact Author)
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )
St. Cross Building
St. Cross Road
Oxford OX1 3UL OX1 3UJ
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 766
Downloads: 285
Download Rank: 30,671
Footnotes: 39
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.156 seconds.