Citations (1)


Footnotes (201)



Torture, Judicial Review, and the Regulation of Custodial Interrogations

Jonathan Hafetz

Seton Hall Law School

NYU Annual Survey of American Law, Vol. 62, No. 3, 2007

Since September 11, the Bush administration has developed an unprecedented global-wide detention system, designed to operate outside any established legal framework or independent oversight. By evading existing constraints on custodial interrogations under domestic and international law, this detention system has undermined the United States' longstanding commitment to the prohibition against torture and other abuse.

This article discusses the relationship between the abandonment or dilution of substantive standards and the role of judicial review in regulating custodial interrogations in counterterrorism operations. The article concludes that standards prohibiting abuse, without meaningful judicial oversight are insufficient to effectively regulate custodial interrogations of prisoners held outside established legal frameworks.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: September 24, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Hafetz, Jonathan, Torture, Judicial Review, and the Regulation of Custodial Interrogations. NYU Annual Survey of American Law, Vol. 62, No. 3, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1016199

Contact Information

Jonathan Hafetz (Contact Author)
Seton Hall Law School ( email )
One Newark Center
Newark, NJ 07102-5210
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 810
Downloads: 149
Download Rank: 115,000
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  201

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds