Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1016725
 
 

Footnotes (67)



 


 



Claims to Information Qua Information and a Structural Theory of Section 101


Kevin Emerson Collins


Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law

2008

Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 103
I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, Vol 4, No. 1, 2008

Abstract:     
In this article, I start from the premises that claims to inventive information qua information are not and should not be patentable, and I pursue two lines of inquiry.

First, I argue that a structural theory of Section 101 of the Patent Act provides a policy-driven, conceptually coherent and statutorily justified interpretation that explains why claims to inventive information qua information should be excluded from the realm of patentable subject matter. In brief, patentable subject matter must be restricted in this manner to preserve the duality of claiming and disclosing upon which the entire patent regime is constructed.

Second, I raise the line-drawing problem that I believe to be the most significant obstacle to an administrable implementation of a structural theory of Section 101. The breadth or polyvalency of the concept of information suggests that many things that we currently treat as patentable, if not all of them, are also information. We must develop a more refined taxonomy of the different types of informationality that material things possess in order to sort the patentable claims to information from the unpatentable ones. Because the immateriality of the things described by a claim is not an acceptable proxy for their informationality, the Federal Circuit's recent opinion in In re Nuijten that addresses intangibility as a restriction on patentable subject matter is not a useful starting point for this project.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: Patents, Intellectual Property

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 25, 2007 ; Last revised: June 30, 2013

Suggested Citation

Collins, Kevin Emerson, Claims to Information Qua Information and a Structural Theory of Section 101 (2008). Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 103; I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, Vol 4, No. 1, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1016725 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1016725

Contact Information

Kevin Emerson Collins (Contact Author)
Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law ( email )
Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 541
Downloads: 106
Download Rank: 150,088
Footnotes:  67

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.234 seconds