Footnotes (117)



Beyond Black's and Webster's: Persuasive Value of Thesauri

Brian J. Craig

September 2007

Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-04

The U.S. Supreme Court has increasingly relied on dictionaries and numerous articles have discussed the persuasive value of dictionaries to construe statutes, contracts, and patent claims. Despite this extensive theoretical literature, a dearth of scholarly literature remains on the efficacy of thesauri in the legal framework. This article discusses the value of thesauri, in conjunction with dictionaries, as persuasive secondary sources to ascertain the plain and ordinary meaning of words and phrases. Based on empirical research, this article examines the frequency of opinions that cite to thesauri from 1990 to 2006. The article also provides a review of opinions where courts found thesauri persuasive and unpersuasive in construing statutes, regulations, and contracts. Finally, the article discusses the benefits of using thesauri in legal research.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: thesaurus, dictionary, legal writing, persuasive secondary sources

JEL Classification: K10

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 27, 2007 ; Last revised: September 28, 2009

Suggested Citation

Craig, Brian J., Beyond Black's and Webster's: Persuasive Value of Thesauri (September 2007). Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-04. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1017178 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1017178

Contact Information

No contact information is available for Brian J. Craig
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 918
Downloads: 72
Download Rank: 244,156
Footnotes:  117

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds