Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1017513
 
 

Footnotes (136)



 


 



Removed Cases and Uninvoked Jurisdictional Grounds


Jeannette Cox


University of Dayton School of Law


North Carolina Law Review, April 2008

Abstract:     
Traditionally understood, a congressional grant of federal subject matter jurisdiction alone does not confer authority on a federal court to hear a case; a party to the case must also affirmatively invoke the applicable jurisdictional ground. In a sharp break from this traditional understanding, federal courts have recently begun to exercise jurisdiction over cases based on jurisdictional grounds no party has invoked. Courts adopting this practice have concluded that a district court must retain removed cases that meet the requirements of a congressionally-authorized ground of subject matter jurisdiction even when an arguably antecedent requirement - party invocation of that jurisdictional ground - has not occurred. This article identifies and criticizes this development, coining the phrase mandatory retention to describe federal courts' decision to exercise jurisdiction over cases based on jurisdictional grounds no party has invoked. The article recommends that courts equalize plaintiffs' and defendants' abilities to amend their jurisdictional allegations rather than shift responsibility for establishing jurisdiction in removed cases from the defendant to the federal court.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: jurisdiction, removal, federalism, mandatory, retention, invoke

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 27, 2007 ; Last revised: August 26, 2008

Suggested Citation

Cox, Jeannette, Removed Cases and Uninvoked Jurisdictional Grounds. North Carolina Law Review, April 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1017513

Contact Information

Jeannette Cox (Contact Author)
University of Dayton School of Law ( email )
300 College Park
Dayton, OH 45469
United States
937-229-4656 (Phone)
937-229-2469 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.udayton.edu/directory/law/cox_jeannette.php
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 766
Downloads: 118
Download Rank: 139,815
Footnotes:  136

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.203 seconds