Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1018526
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (150)



 


 



Arbitration Law's Separability Doctrine After Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna


Stephen J. Ware


University of Kansas - School of Law


Nevada Law Journal, Vol. 8, No. 107, 2007

Abstract:     
The recent case of Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, is only the second Supreme Court decision applying the separability doctrine and it comes nearly forty years after the Court's first separability decision, Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Manufacturing Co. Arbitration's tremendous growth during those forty years - and the arrival of Buckeye - make this an opportune time to assess the current state of the separability doctrine. In doing that, this Article will analyze Prima Paint and Buckeye and discuss the separability issues they leave unresolved. Finally, this Article will critique the separability doctrine and call for its repeal by Congress.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 3, 2007 ; Last revised: February 24, 2008

Suggested Citation

Ware, Stephen J., Arbitration Law's Separability Doctrine After Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna. Nevada Law Journal, Vol. 8, No. 107, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1018526

Contact Information

Stephen J. Ware (Contact Author)
University of Kansas - School of Law ( email )
Green Hall
1535 W. 15th Street
Lawrence, KS 66045-7577
United States
785-864-9209 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ku.edu/ware
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,761
Downloads: 308
Download Rank: 54,626
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  150

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.640 seconds