Avoiding Another Step in a Series of Unfortunate Legal Events: A Consideration of Black Life under American Law from 1619 to 1972 and a Challenge to Prevailing Notions of Legally Based Reparations
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law
Boston College Third World Law Journal, 2006
Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-7
The growing body of literature on reparations consists primarily of articles showing that black reparations are consistent with various legal theories, promote racial justice, or further broader societal goals like eliminating poverty and promoting education. This article takes the distinct position of challenging reparations supporters to justify their confidence in the legal system to deliver meaningful reparations for slavery and segregation in light of the historic use of law as a means of instantiating white racial supremacy and the prospective individualistic approach to race adopted by contemporary judges and legislators. The article also challenges those who oppose reparations based on its supposed unfairness to contemporary citizens to explain how their position differs from that of past generations who opposed reparations and related legal efforts to redress racial injustices as unfair at that time. To support the challenge to reparations commentators, the article examines the historical framework of blacks' relationship to the law through legislation and court rulings from 1619-1963. The article closes by presenting an alternative approach to reparations focused on building and strengthening black political, economic, and educational institutions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 43
Keywords: Black, life, under Ameerican, law, challenge, prevailing, notions, legally based, reparationsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 3, 2007 ; Last revised: February 20, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds