Pro Se Executors - Unauthorized Practice of Law, or Not?

Michael Hatfield

University of Washington - School of Law

Baylor Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 2, 2007

In Texas, a probate attorney's client is the executor - not the "estate" or the beneficiaries. This keeps professional responsibilities relatively clear for the attorney. This clear rule is undermined, however, by the "Minnesota rule" adopted by some Texas probate courts. The Minnesota rule denies the rights of executors to appear without an attorney. The premise is that the beneficiaries - rather than the executors - have the legal rights subject to attorney-client representation during an estate administration. While pro se rights at first glance might not seem of much interest to many probate attorneys, the underlying issue of client identity in estate administration is of vital interest. The high fiduciary duties of executors suggests caution to anyone considering proceeding pro se.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 53

Keywords: pro se, texas, independent administration, probate, estate, professional responsibility, fiduciary

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 3, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Hatfield, Michael, Pro Se Executors - Unauthorized Practice of Law, or Not?. Baylor Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 2, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1019011

Contact Information

Michael W. Hatfield (Contact Author)
University of Washington - School of Law ( email )
William H. Gates Hall
Box 353020
Seattle, WA 98105-3020
United States
206-221-1535 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.washington.edu/Directory/Profile.aspx?ID=725
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,449
Downloads: 86
Download Rank: 197,511

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.593 seconds