Abstract

 
 

References (16)



 


 



Loss Aversion and Mental Accounting: The Favorite Longshot Bias in Parimutuel Betting


Jianying Qiu


Max Planck Society for the Advancement of the Sciences - Max Planck Institute for Economics

May 2007

Jena Economic Research Paper No. 2007-017

Abstract:     
Parimutuel betting markets are simplified financial markets, and can thus provide a clearer view of pricing issues which are more complicated elsewhere. Though empirical studies generally conclude that the parimutuel betting markets are surprisingly efficient, it is also found that for horses with lowest odds (favorites), market estimates of winning probabilities are smaller than objective winning probabilities; for horses with highest odds (longshot), the opposite is observed. This phenomenon, called the favorite longshot bias, has many explanations such as risk seeking preference, transaction costs, and non-linear transformation of probabilities into decision weights, etc. This paper combines loss aversion with mental accounting, and provides a new explanation for the favorite longshot bias. We show that the bias exists in the absence of all above mentioned reasons, and the degree of the bias differs depending on the type of the mental accounting process that bettors apply.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: loss aversion, mental accounting, parimutuel betting, the favorite longshot bias

JEL Classification: C72, D40, D81, G10

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 5, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Qiu, Jianying, Loss Aversion and Mental Accounting: The Favorite Longshot Bias in Parimutuel Betting (May 2007). Jena Economic Research Paper No. 2007-017. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1019426 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1019426

Contact Information

Jianying Qiu (Contact Author)
Max Planck Society for the Advancement of the Sciences - Max Planck Institute for Economics ( email )
Kahlaische Strasse 10
D-07745 Jena
Germany
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 683
Downloads: 160
Download Rank: 92,446
References:  16
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds