SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

When a Rose Isn't 'Arose' Isn't Arroz: A Student Guide to Footnoting for Informational Clarity and Scholarly Discourse

William B.T. Mock
The John Marshall Law School (Chicago)



International Journal of Legal Information, Vol. 34, No. 1, p. 87, 2006

Abstract:     
This short article is a guide for authors, student editors, and research assistants to the major types of footnotes and how to prepare them. First, I introduce the three basic types of text requiring footnote citations - those containing (a) references, (b) facts, and (c) ideas. Footnotes for references are designed to allow your readers to retrace your research and to decide for themselves whether your line of analysis is correct. Footnotes for facts are designed to provide your reader with additional background information about anything you have mentioned that may not be familiar to your readers, including potentially obscure people, places, objects, events. Footnotes for ideas are designed to place your arguments, ideas, and analyses in the broader intellectual context of those scholars who have already considered your subject, and often offers glimpses down the side avenues of discourse that cannot be pursued in the article itself. The article concludes with some guidelines for undertaking research in ways that make it easier to prepare scholarly footnotes efficiently and correctly.

Keywords: footnotes, scholarhip, law reviews, law journals, research assistants, student editors, Bluebook, Blue Book, Maroon Book, ALWD Citation Manual, legal writing, lawyering skills, editing, drafting

JEL Classifications: K00

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: November 07, 2007 ; Last revised: November 16, 2007

Suggested Citation

Mock, William B.T., When a Rose Isn't 'Arose' Isn't Arroz: A Student Guide to Footnoting for Informational Clarity and Scholarly Discourse. International Journal of Legal Information, Vol. 34, No. 1, p. 87, 2006. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1019891


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

William B.T. Mock (Contact Author)
The John Marshall Law School (Chicago) ( email )
315 South Plymouth Court
Chicago, IL 60604
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,129
Downloads: 365
Download Rank: 21,581

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.156 seconds.