Citations (1)


Footnotes (59)



Due Process and Punitive Damages: An Economic Approach

Keith N. Hylton

Boston University - School of Law

October 9, 2007

Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 07-26

This paper sets out a public choice (rent-seeking) theory of the Due Process Clause, which implies that the function of the clause is to prevent takings through the legislative or common law process. This view of the clause's function supports a preference for expanding rather than contracting the set of entitlements protected by the clause. The Supreme Court's application of due process reasoning in the punitive damages case law is in some respects consistent and in other respects inconsistent with this theory. For the most part, the Court has failed to develop a set of doctrines that would enable lower courts to distinguish takings from punishment consistent with reasonable regulation. This paper suggests general guidelines for developing such doctrines.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: torts, law and economics, litigation, rent-seeking, due process clause, public choice, Philip Morris v. Williams, Lochner

JEL Classification: K00, K13, K41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 10, 2007 ; Last revised: October 23, 2007

Suggested Citation

Hylton, Keith N., Due Process and Punitive Damages: An Economic Approach (October 9, 2007). Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 07-26. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1020262 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1020262

Contact Information

Keith N. Hylton (Contact Author)
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-8959 (Phone)
617-353-3077 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,199
Downloads: 188
Download Rank: 106,784
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  59

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds