Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1021005
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (221)



 


 



Bringing Discipline to the Civilianization of the Battlefield: A Proposal for a More Legitimate Approach to Resurrecting Military Criminal Jurisdiction over Civilian Augmentees


Geoffrey S. Corn


South Texas College of Law


University of Miami Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Since the 1990's, the numbers of civilian contractors deployed in support of U.S. military operations (civilian augmentees) has exploded. This privatization trend has reached historically unprecedented levels in Iraq, where most estimates indicate there are today more civilian contractors deployed than members of the armed forces. Beginning in the late 1990's, this trend generated serious concerns over the perceived immunity of these civilian support personnel from disciplinary sanctions. In response, and because of a decades old decision effectively excluding civilians from the jurisdiction of military courts, Congress responded by passing Federal criminal statutes extending U.S. criminal law to reach contractors.

However, the exponential role of civilians in Iraq, and the ineffective implementation of these criminal statutes seemed to reinforce the perception that civilian augmentees enjoyed de facto immunity for their misconduct. Congress responded in 2006 with an amendment to the Uniform Code of Military Justice effectively resurrecting military criminal jurisdiction over these civilians. Ostensibly unexpected by the Department of Defense, this amendment raises potentially serious constitutional questions, and has yet to be implemented.

This article analyzes the genesis of this amendment, and why there is as much uncertainty today regarding the constitutional validity of subjecting civilians to military criminal jurisdiction as existed thirty years ago when the predecessor provision of the UCMJ was struck down by the highest military appellate court. While acknowledging the legitimate necessity of subjecting civilian augmentees to disciplinary authority, the article argues that the recent amendment is unjustifiably over-broad. The article then proposes an alternative amendment that would provide a more balanced means to accommodate this legitimate military need. This amendment would provide military commanders a non-criminal disciplinary tool to apply to civilian augmentees by subjecting them to the limited jurisdiction of summary courts-martial, best understood as a quasi-judicial forum that does not result in a criminal conviction. Such an approach would enable military commanders to respond to a wide array of minor disciplinary infractions while reserving more serious misconduct to the jurisdiction of Federal courts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: national security, military law, UCMJ, law of war, contractors, military jurisdiction

JEL Classification: K10, K14, K33, K40

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 14, 2007 ; Last revised: June 10, 2008

Suggested Citation

Corn, Geoffrey S., Bringing Discipline to the Civilianization of the Battlefield: A Proposal for a More Legitimate Approach to Resurrecting Military Criminal Jurisdiction over Civilian Augmentees. University of Miami Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1021005

Contact Information

Geoffrey S. Corn (Contact Author)
South Texas College of Law ( email )
1303 San Jacinto Street
Houston, TX 77002
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 785
Downloads: 95
Download Rank: 161,014
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  221

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.453 seconds