Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1021065
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (69)



 


 



Defining and Measuring A2K: A Blueprint for an Index of Access to Knowledge


Lea Shaver


Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

2008

I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 4, no. 2 (2008): 235-269

Abstract:     
Access to knowledge (A2K) is increasingly recognized as the central human development issue of our time. Yet to date there has been little literature defining precisely what is meant by this term, much less how to evaluate the progress toward achieving it. To help bridge this gap, this article offers a blueprint for an A2K index: a quantitative tool integrating a variety of data points to assess how well countries promote access to knowledge. The proposed index tracks five key dimensions of access to knowledge: education for informational literacy, access to the global knowledge commons, access to knowledge goods, an enabling legal framework, and effective innovation systems. The resulting conceptual map offers a concrete introduction to the A2K framework for information scholars and professionals.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: access to knowledge, A2K, innovation, intellectual property, libraries, information, literacy, index, indices, measurement, technology, education, communications, knowledge economy, information society, ISP

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 15, 2007 ; Last revised: May 3, 2014

Suggested Citation

Shaver, Lea, Defining and Measuring A2K: A Blueprint for an Index of Access to Knowledge (2008). I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 4, no. 2 (2008): 235-269. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1021065

Contact Information

Lea Bishop Shaver (Contact Author)
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law ( email )
530 West New York Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,798
Downloads: 286
Download Rank: 62,078
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  69
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.484 seconds