Social Hosts' Responsibility for Their Intoxicated Guests: Where Courts Fear to Tread
Melbourne Law School
Tania S. Voon
University of Melbourne - Melbourne Law School
U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 265
Torts Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 62-86, 2007
The recent Supreme Court of Canada case, Childs v. Desormeaux, provides a valuable opportunity to reassess the High Court of Australia's position regarding the liability of commercial hosts for the injurious conduct of their intoxicated clientele, as well as the likely Australian approach to social host liability. In Canada, while commercial hosts owe a duty of care to their impaired patrons, social hosts ordinarily do not. In Australia, courts would be reluctant to impose a duty on either type of host. Moreover, the trend in Australia away from imposing liability in tort makes social hosts just one more example of potential tortfeasors with little incentive to engage in responsible conduct, thereby threatening public safety. Difficulties with the potential use of Australian tort law as a deterrent are highlighted by the High Court's likely response to an innocent passenger like Zoe Childs, rendered a paraplegic at 18 years of age by a partygoer's drunk driving.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26
Keywords: host, social, intoxicated, guest, responsibility
JEL Classification: K13Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 15, 2007
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.844 seconds