|
||||
|
||||
Two Flaws in Business Cycle DatingLawrence J. ChristianoNorthwestern University; Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland; Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago; Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Joshua Mark DavisPacific Investment Management Company (PIMCO); Northwestern University - Department of Economics October 2006 FRB of Cleveland Working Paper No. 06-12 Abstract: Using "business cycle accounting," Chari, Kehoe, and McGrattan (2006) conclude that models of financial frictions which create a wedge in the intertemporal Euler equation are not promising avenues for modeling business cycle dynamics. There are two reasons that this conclusion is not warranted. First, small changes in the implementation of business cycle accounting overturn Chari, Kehoe, and McGrattan's conclusions. Second, one way that shocks to the intertemporal wedge affect the economy is by their spillover effects onto other wedges. This potentially important mechanism for the transmission of intertemporal-wedge shocks is not identified under business cycle accounting. Chari, Kehoe, and McGrattan potentially understate the importance of these shocks by adopting the extreme position that spillover effects are zero.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 62 Keywords: business cycle accounting, financial frictions, intertemporal wedge, spillover effects JEL Classification: E32, E33 working papers seriesDate posted: October 19, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.516 seconds