Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1022387
 
 

Footnotes (164)



 


 



History, Memory and Judgment: Holocaust Denial, the History Wars, and Law's Problems with the Past


Lawrence McNamara


University of Reading - School of Law


Sydney Law Review, Vol. 26, p. 353, 2004

Abstract:     
Australia's current 'History Wars' raise difficult historiographical questions about establishing what happened in the past. In light of the courts' often important engagements with history, these questions have special significance for the law. Using the Irving v Lipstadt libel case regarding Holocaust denial and the possibility of a defamation action in the History Wars - both allege deliberate fabrication and distortion - this article explores how history and historians are subjected to legal judgment. It identifies as key considerations the methodological differences between and within law and history; the use and misuse of postmodernism and relativism; and the role of law and legal judgment in the transmission and construction of national memory.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

Keywords: Holocaust denial, history, memory, defamation, libel, law and history, Australian history, Irving, Lipstadt

JEL Classification: K19, K39

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 18, 2007  

Suggested Citation

McNamara, Lawrence, History, Memory and Judgment: Holocaust Denial, the History Wars, and Law's Problems with the Past. Sydney Law Review, Vol. 26, p. 353, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1022387

Contact Information

Lawrence McNamara (Contact Author)
University of Reading - School of Law ( email )
Reading, RG6 6AH
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,607
Downloads: 253
Download Rank: 68,076
Footnotes:  164

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.360 seconds