Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1023321
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (402)



 


 



Is the Death of the Death Penalty Near? The Impact of Atkins and Roper on the Future of Capital Punishment for Mentally Ill Defendants


Helen Shin


Fordham Law Review


Fordham Law Review, Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 465-516, October 2007

Abstract:     
In recent years, the U.S. Supreme Court created two categorical exemptions to the death penalty for offenders who are considered to have diminished culpability as compared to other capital defendants. In Atkins v. Virginia, the Court exempted mentally retarded offenders. Three years later, in Roper v. Simmons, the Court extended the protection to juveniles. Based on these cases, the practices of foreign countries, and the opinions of professional organizations with relevant expertise, legal scholars speculate that the Court may, in the future, categorically exclude severely mentally ill offenders from the death penalty. This Note examines the feasibility of such an exemption for the mentally ill and considers its possible repercussions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: Death Penalty, Mentally Ill, Capital Punishment, Mental Illness, Atkins, Roper

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 30, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Shin, Helen, Is the Death of the Death Penalty Near? The Impact of Atkins and Roper on the Future of Capital Punishment for Mentally Ill Defendants. Fordham Law Review, Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 465-516, October 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1023321

Contact Information

Helen Shin (Contact Author)
Fordham Law Review ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,711
Downloads: 307
Download Rank: 57,772
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  402

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.359 seconds