|
||||
|
||||
Optimal Energy Investment and R&D Strategies to Stabilise Greenhouse Gas Atmospheric ConcentrationsValentina BosettiFondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM); Bocconi University; CMCC - Euro Mediterranean Centre for Climate Change Carlo CarraroFondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM); Ca Foscari University of Venice - Department of Economics; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); CMCC - Euro Mediterranean Centre for Climate Change (Climate Policy Division); IPCC Working Group III Emanuele MassettiFondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) & Euro-Mediterranean Center for Climate Change; Yale University - School of Forestry and Environmental Studies; CMCC - Euro Mediterranean Centre for Climate Change Massimo TavoniFondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM); Princeton University - Princeton Environmental Institute October 1, 2007 FEEM Working Paper No. 95.2007 University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Dept. of Economics Research Paper Series No. 22/WP/2007 CESifo Working Paper Series No. 2133 CMCC Research Paper No. 13 Abstract: The stabilisation of GHG atmospheric concentrations at levels expected to prevent dangerous climate change has become an important, global, long-term objective. It is therefore crucial to identify a cost-effective way to achieve this objective. In this paper we use WITCH, a hybrid climate-energy-economy model, to obtain a quantitative assessment of some cost-effective strategies that stabilise CO2 concentrations at 550 or 450 ppm. In particular, this paper analyses the energy investment and R&D policies that optimally achieve these two GHG stabilisation targets (i.e. the future optimal energy mix consistent with the stabilisation of GHG atmospheric concentrations at 550 and 450 ppm). Given that the model accounts for interdependencies and spillovers across 12 regions of the world, optimal strategies are the outcome of a dynamic game through which inefficiency costs induced by global strategic interactions can be assessed. Therefore, our results are somehow different from previous analyses of GHG stabilisation policies, where a central planner or a single global economy are usually assumed. In particular, the effects of free-riding incentives in reducing emissions and in investing in R&D are taken into account. Technical change being endogenous in WITCH, this paper also provides an assessment of the implications of technological evolution in the energy sector of different stabilisation scenarios. Finally, this paper quantifies the net costs of stabilising GHG concentrations at different levels, for different allocations of permits and for different technological scenarios. In each case, the optimal long-term investment strategies for all available energy technologies are determined. The case of an unknown backstop energy technology is also analysed.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29 Keywords: Climate Policy, Energy R&D, Investments, Stabilisation Costs JEL Classification: H0, H2, H3, H4, O3, Q4 working papers seriesDate posted: October 22, 2007 ; Last revised: April 25, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.547 seconds