To Have a Target Debt Ratio or Not: What Difference Does it Make?
Abe De Jong
Erasmus University - Rotterdam School of Management
Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Economics (ESE)
October 28, 2009
Applied Financial Economics, Forthcoming
The static tradeoff theory of capital structure predicts that firms aim to approach a target debt ratio. The theory provides several firm characteristics that determine this target ratio. In contrast, the pecking order model rejects a target debt ratio, because firms are expected to finance investments subsequently from (internal) equity, debt, and (external) equity. A fundamental problem in empirical studies is that having a target debt ratio or not is unobservable from public data. We use survey evidence from 235 CFOs to discriminate static tradeoff firms from pecking order firms and relate the responses to public data. For the two sets of firms we estimate standard capital structure models and find that pecking order firms contaminate static tradeoff theory-based estimations.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20
Keywords: pecking order theory, static tradeoff theory
JEL Classification: C42, G32Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 22, 2007 ; Last revised: October 29, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds