Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1023659
 
 

Footnotes (108)



 


 



Circles of E-Consumer Trust: Old E-America v. New E-Europe


Michael L. Rustad


Suffolk University Law School; Stetson University - College of Law


Michigan State University College of Law Journal of International Law, Forthcoming
Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 07-37

Abstract:     
Robert Kagan's article in The Economist entitled, Old America v. New Europe, obliterates the American assumption that Europe is a clapped-out old continent while America is the young teenager. For example, Kagan notes how America's political system is old in comparison to the upstart European Community. The transnational divide in consumer rights in electronic commerce is yet another example of Old America and New Europe. The American free market approach to consumer e-commerce relies largely upon private ordering generally taking the form of one-sided clickwrap license agreements that disclaim all warranties, meaningful remedies, and require consumers to litigate in the functional equivalent of Siberia. U.S. courts have been inclined to enforce mass-market license agreements so long as consumers have a right to manifest assent after reviewing the terms. European courts will not enforce these adhesive contracts because of mandatory consumer protection rules such as the Unfair Contract Terms Directive and the Distance Selling Directive. As a result, there is a chasm between U.S. and European consumer protection rules in cyberspace. The U.S. is from Mars and Europe from Venus when it comes to mandatory consumer protection rules in e-commerce transactions.

Part I of this Article introduces New Europe's substantive consumer rules governing e-commerce (as well as the bricks and mortar world). Part II explores, compares and contrasts U.S. style cyberspace jurisdiction with the mandatory consumer rules of the Brussels Regulation. Part III compares U.S. conflict of law to the mandatory private international law of Europe. In each of these areas, the twenty-seven countries of the European Community have promulgated minimum adequate consumer remedies. In contrast, U.S. consumers have, in effect, anti-warranties and remedies in e-commerce transactions. The Old America and New Europe must harmonize their radically different approaches to build circles of consumer trust in cyberspace.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 23, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Rustad, Michael L., Circles of E-Consumer Trust: Old E-America v. New E-Europe. Michigan State University College of Law Journal of International Law, Forthcoming; Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 07-37. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1023659

Contact Information

Michael L. Rustad (Contact Author)
Suffolk University Law School ( email )
120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States

Stetson University - College of Law ( email )
1401 61st Street South
Gulfport, FL 33707
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,354
Downloads: 292
Download Rank: 58,561
Footnotes:  108

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.265 seconds