Footnotes (25)



The Misguided Defenses of Miranda v. Arizona

Ronald J. Allen

Northwestern University Law School

Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 5, p. 205, 2007

The various explanations and justifications for the decision in Miranda v. Arizona are examined and founding wanting. A proposed solution to the problem of providing a coherent concept of compelled self-incrimination is offered.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: Miranda, coercion, compulsion, self-incrimination, incrimination, Warren court, constitutional criminal procedure, constitutional interpretation

JEL Classification: K14, K40

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 22, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Allen, Ronald J., The Misguided Defenses of Miranda v. Arizona. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 5, p. 205, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1023666

Contact Information

Ronald Jay Allen (Contact Author)
Northwestern University Law School ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-503-8372 (Phone)
312-503-2035 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 843
Downloads: 133
Download Rank: 162,944
Footnotes:  25

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds