Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1023666
 
 

Footnotes (25)



 


 



The Misguided Defenses of Miranda v. Arizona


Ronald J. Allen


Northwestern University Law School


Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 5, p. 205, 2007

Abstract:     
The various explanations and justifications for the decision in Miranda v. Arizona are examined and founding wanting. A proposed solution to the problem of providing a coherent concept of compelled self-incrimination is offered.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: Miranda, coercion, compulsion, self-incrimination, incrimination, Warren court, constitutional criminal procedure, constitutional interpretation

JEL Classification: K14, K40

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 22, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Allen, Ronald J., The Misguided Defenses of Miranda v. Arizona. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 5, p. 205, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1023666

Contact Information

Ronald Jay Allen (Contact Author)
Northwestern University Law School ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
312-503-8372 (Phone)
312-503-2035 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 745
Downloads: 113
Download Rank: 146,293
Footnotes:  25

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.312 seconds