The Misguided Defenses of Miranda v. Arizona
Ronald J. Allen
Northwestern University Law School
Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 5, p. 205, 2007
The various explanations and justifications for the decision in Miranda v. Arizona are examined and founding wanting. A proposed solution to the problem of providing a coherent concept of compelled self-incrimination is offered.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Keywords: Miranda, coercion, compulsion, self-incrimination, incrimination, Warren court, constitutional criminal procedure, constitutional interpretation
JEL Classification: K14, K40Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 22, 2007
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds