Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1023704
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (161)



 


 



McMahon Turns Twenty: The Regulation of Fairness in Securities Arbitration


Jill Gross


Pace Law School


University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, 2007

Abstract:     
In light of the twentieth anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Shearson v. McMahon enforcing a pre-dispute arbitration clause in a brokerage customer's account agreement, the author revisits the assumptions of the McMahon Court supporting its conclusion that arbitration is fair to investors. The article first explores the various sources of law, including the Federal Arbitration Act, which could require fairness in securities arbitration. The article then examines the Securities and Exchange Commission's oversight of securities arbitration, particularly in the last ten years. The article concludes that the SEC sufficiently regulates the fairness of securities arbitration, and thus the McMahon paradigm appears to be working.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: arbitration, securities arbitration, arbitration fairness, McMahon

JEL Classification: K22, K10

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: October 23, 2007 ; Last revised: June 30, 2010

Suggested Citation

Gross, Jill, McMahon Turns Twenty: The Regulation of Fairness in Securities Arbitration. University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1023704

Contact Information

Jill Gross (Contact Author)
Pace Law School ( email )
78 North Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,373
Downloads: 166
Download Rank: 108,590
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  161

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.312 seconds