Footnotes (17)



The English Warning

Craig Bradley

Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Trial Magazine, Vol. 43, December 2007
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 90

This article proposes that the warning given to English criminal suspects prior to interrogation, in addition to the Miranda-type warnings - that your silence may be used against you if it is inconsistent with a defense raised at trial - is desirable to derail spurious defenses raised by defendants at trial and is supported by ordinary evidence law. The constitutional unfairness bar to using post-warning silence imposed by Doyle v. Ohio is obviated when the suspect is warned of possible use. Subsequent Supreme Court cases, such as South Dakota v. Neville suggest that such a system would meet with Supreme Court approval.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: Miranda warnings, use of silence, Fifth amendment, right to silence, Doyle, Neville, Beckles v. United Kingdom

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 23, 2007 ; Last revised: June 29, 2013

Suggested Citation

Bradley, Craig, The English Warning. Trial Magazine, Vol. 43, December 2007; Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 90. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1024027

Contact Information

Craig Bradley (Contact Author)
Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )
211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 711
Downloads: 102
Download Rank: 179,687
Footnotes:  17

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.391 seconds