Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1024262
 
 

Footnotes (209)



 


 



Lost in Translation in the Law School Classroom: Assessing Required Coursework in LL.M. Programs for International Students


Julie M. Spanbauer


The John Marshall Law School


International Journal of Legal Information, Vol. 35, No. 3

Abstract:     
This article presents survey results of all ABA-accredited law school LL.M. programs for English-as-second-language (ESL) students. The field of contrastive rhetoric has focused on these students, many of whom have technical expertise in particular areas, such as the law, before entering U.S. graduate programs. Unfortunately, the techniques and pedagogy developed to assist these students has not found its way into the legal literature. One purpose of this article is to document these students' needs. Another purpose is to present an overview of what U.S. law schools are doing (or not doing) to assist these students who are being admitted in greater numbers to U.S. law schools. A final purpose is to compare these students to entering J.D. students who are similar in the sense that they too are learning to navigate a new culture and a new language, the language of the law. The techniques and pedagogy used separately with these two groups of students can and should be shared.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: contrastive rhetoric, English-as-a second-language, international law students, legal writing, LL.M., pedagogy

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 25, 2007 ; Last revised: December 9, 2012

Suggested Citation

Spanbauer, Julie M., Lost in Translation in the Law School Classroom: Assessing Required Coursework in LL.M. Programs for International Students. International Journal of Legal Information, Vol. 35, No. 3. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1024262

Contact Information

Julie M. Spanbauer (Contact Author)
The John Marshall Law School ( email )
315 South Plymouth Court
Chicago, IL 60604
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,196
Downloads: 207
Download Rank: 83,848
Footnotes:  209

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds