Liberating Legal Education from the Judicial Model
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law
Seton Hall Legislative Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2003
The emphasis in legal pedagogy on the judicial model of legal decisionmaking comes at the expense of adequate attention to the lawmaking activities of legislators and administrative regulators. The judicial model acquaints students with the development of law through the resolution of articulated disputes among specifically identifies parties. But most leave law school ill-prepared to be effective advocates and advisors for clients involved with legislative and regulatory decision makers. This observation resonates with the laments of some legal scholars over several decades, yet the problem persists. This essay delineates how legislative and regulatory decisionmaking differ from litigation in ways that make the judicial model an insufficient basis for instruction. It summarizes the implications of those distinctions for legal education and society beyond the legal academy. Finally, this essay offers reasons for problem's persistence and recommends ways in which legal educators and publishers of legal instruction materials can make useful changes.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44
Keywords: legal education, judges, Congress, administrative law, legislation
JEL Classification: K10, K19, K30, K39, K40 K49Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: October 25, 2007 ; Last revised: December 9, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds