Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1024747
 
 

Footnotes (108)



 


 



The Realism of Judges Past and Present


Brian Z. Tamanaha


Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law

2008

Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 56, 2008
St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-0085

Abstract:     
Political scientists regularly assert that judges are deluded or deceptive about the nature of judicial decision making. This article shows, to the contrary, that for more than a century judges have candidly expressed a balanced realism about judging. Judges admit that sometimes they must make law. Judges admit that law is sometimes uncertain. Judges admit that their personal values can have an influence on their legal decisions. All of these limitations are inherent to law and to judges as human decision makers. Judges insist that despite these limitations, their decisions are substantially determined by the law. This article demonstrates that judges have much to say about judging that is reliable and insightful.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 7, 2008 ; Last revised: January 10, 2009

Suggested Citation

Tamanaha, Brian Z., The Realism of Judges Past and Present (2008). Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 56, 2008; St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-0085. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1024747

Contact Information

Brian Z. Tamanaha (Contact Author)
Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law ( email )
Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,242
Downloads: 578
Download Rank: 24,923
Footnotes:  108

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.219 seconds