Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1024824
 
 

Footnotes (175)



 


 



A Convenient Untruth: Fact and Fantasy in the Doctrine of Odious Debts (with Response: Reflections on 'A Convenient Untruth')


G. Mitu Gulati


Duke University - School of Law

Sarah Ludington


Campbell University - Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law; Duke University School of Law; North Carolina Central University (NCCU); Campbell University Norman Andrian Wiggins School of Law

Arthur Mark Weisburd


University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law


Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 48, No. 3
Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 174

Abstract:     
The few years since the U.S. incursion into Iraq in 2003 have witnessed an explosion in the literature on odious debts - that is, debts incurred (a) without the consent of the people (e.g., by a despotic regime); (b) from which no benefits accrued to the people; and (c) when the creditors had knowledge of the foregoing. The key question in the literature is whether successors to the despotic regime are obligated to pay the debts of the despot. That is, whether the newly democratic nation of Iraq is obligated to pay the debts of Saddam Hussein. The starting point for almost every discussion - scholarly or popular - of this doctrine is an obscure legal scholar named Alexander Nahum Sack, variously described as the pre-eminent scholar on public debts of his time, a former minister to Tsar Nicholas II, and a Russian professor of law who penned the doctrine of odious debts while teaching in Paris. This Article excavates the background of Alexander Sack, separating the reality of his life from the myth perpetuated in the odious debts literature. Instead of the heroic and eminent Tsarist exile, the evidence reveals a peripatetic legal scholar who taught in five different universities on two continents, and after being fired from a tenured position, ended his life penniless. We are left then with these questions: What does the reality of Sack mean for the legal status of the odious debts doctrine? And how is it that he achieved this iconic status when even minimal inquiry would have revealed a far more murky reality?

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: October 27, 2007 ; Last revised: May 15, 2008

Suggested Citation

Gulati, G. Mitu and Ludington, Sarah and Weisburd, Mark, A Convenient Untruth: Fact and Fantasy in the Doctrine of Odious Debts (with Response: Reflections on 'A Convenient Untruth'). Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 48, No. 3; Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 174. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1024824

Contact Information

Gaurang Mitu Gulati (Contact Author)
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Sarah Ludington
Campbell University - Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law ( email ) ( email )
United States
Duke University School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
North Carolina Central University (NCCU) ( email )
Durham, NC 27707
United States
919-530-6171 (Phone)
Campbell University Norman Andrian Wiggins School of Law ( email ) ( email )
United States
Arthur Mark Weisburd
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law ( email )
Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States
919-962-8515 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,516
Downloads: 173
Download Rank: 100,240
Footnotes:  175

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.312 seconds