|
||||
|
||||
Do Tax Cuts Starve the Beast: The Effect of Tax Changes on Government Spending
Christina D. Romer University of California, Berkeley - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) David H. Romer University of California, Berkeley - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) October 2007 NBER Working Paper No. W13548 Abstract: The hypothesis that decreases in taxes reduce future government spending is often cited as a reason for cutting taxes. However, because taxes change for many reasons, examinations of the relationship between overall measures of taxation and subsequent spending are plagued by problems of reverse causation and omitted variable bias. To deal with these problems, this paper examines the behavior of government expenditures following legislated tax changes that narrative sources suggest are largely uncorrelated with other factors affecting spending. The results provide no support for the hypothesis that tax cuts restrain government spending; indeed, they suggest that tax cuts may actually increase spending. The results also indicate that the main effect of tax cuts on the government budget is to induce subsequent legislated tax increases. Examination of four episodes of major tax cuts reinforces these conclusions.
JEL Classifications: E62, H50, H60, N12 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: October 31, 2007 ; Last revised: January 16, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.141 seconds.