Alternative Benchmarks for Evaluating REIT Mutual Fund Performance
Jay C. Hartzell
University of Texas at Austin - Department of Finance
Indiana University Bloomington - Department of Finance; University of Texas at Austin - Department of Finance
University of Texas at Austin - Department of Finance; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
October 6, 2008
While Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) have experienced very high growth rates over the past 15 years, the growth in mutual funds that invest in REITs has been even more dramatic. REIT mutual fund returns are typically presented relative to the return on a simple value-weighted REIT index. We ask whether including additional factors when benchmarking funds' returns can improve the explanatory power of the models and offer more precise estimates of alpha. We investigate three sets of REIT-based benchmarks, plus an index of returns derived from non-REIT real estate firms, namely homebuilders, and real estate operating companies. The REIT-based factors are a set of characteristic factors, a set of property-type factors, and a set of statistical factors. Using traditional single index benchmarks, we find that about six percent of the REIT funds exhibit significant positive performance using traditional significance levels, which is more than twice what random chance would predict. However, with the multiple index benchmarks that we prefer, this falls considerably, to only 0.7 percent. In addition, we find that these sets of factors and the non-REIT indices better explain the month-to-month returns of the REIT mutual funds. This suggests that investors or researchers evaluating REIT mutual fund performance may benefit from a multiple benchmark approach.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 40
Keywords: REITs, Mutual Funds, Performance Evaluation
JEL Classification: G11, G12, G23working papers series
Date posted: November 1, 2007 ; Last revised: October 7, 2008
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.547 seconds