SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)

Beta

 


 



Foreword, The Supreme Court, 1995 Term: Leaving Things Undecided

Cass R. Sunstein
Harvard University - Harvard Law School



Harvard Law Review, 1996.

Abstract:     
This essay offers a qualified defense of "decisional minimalism" -- the idea that courts should minimize the burdens of decision and the likelihood and seriousness of errors by offering the narrowest rationale necessary to defend an outcome. It distinguishes between "shallowness" and "narrowness" and explains the values served by each. It applies the analysis of minimalism not only to Dred Scott, Brown v. Bd., and Roe v. Wade, but also to the central cases of the past term (above all Romer v. Evans, which it defends as salutary minimalism) and future disputes over the right to die, same-sex marriage, and affirmative action.

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: December 20, 1996 ; Last revised: February 15, 2001

Suggested Citation

Sunstein, Cass R., Foreword, The Supreme Court, 1995 Term: Leaving Things Undecided. Harvard Law Review, 1996.. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=10256


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Cass R. Sunstein (Contact Author)
Harvard University - Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts Ave
Areeda Hall 225
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-496-2291 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,749
Downloads: 0
Citations: 1

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.187 seconds.