|
||||
|
||||
Do Analyst Recommendations Reflect Shareholder Rights?Don M. AutoreFlorida State University - College of Business Tunde KovacsNortheastern University - Finance and Insurance Area Vivek SinghUniversity of Michigan at Dearborn - School of Management April 10, 2008 Abstract: We examine whether sell-side analyst recommendations reflect shareholder rights. Our rationale is that analysts should be influenced by external governance only if market participants do not efficiently price its value. We find that stronger shareholder rights are associated with more favorable recommendations. Further analysis reveals that analysts favor firms with strong shareholder rights only when strong rights appear to be warranted, but do not penalize firms for having strong rights when not needed. These findings occupy middle ground in the debate on the pricing efficiency of shareholder rights. Moreover, we find that firm value is positively associated with the strength of shareholder rights regardless of the expected external governance structure. The latter result is consistent with a "one-size-fits-all" interpretation, and implies that firms across the board should reduce their number of anti-takeover provisions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 31 Keywords: analyst recommendations, corporate governance, shareholder rights, anti-takeover provisions, market efficiency JEL Classification: G24, G29, G34, G14 working papers seriesDate posted: November 5, 2007 ; Last revised: December 5, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.390 seconds